News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Trump's global tariffs struck down by US Supreme Court by ceejayoz on Friday February 20, 2026 @11:57AM (#47090535)
Biden shared a delusion with Schumer and first-term Obama, that the Republicans have a behavioral floor they won't gleefully take a jackhammer to.

Democrats are finally waking up to this, I think, given the recent retaliatory gerrymandering in CA and VA.

Re:Trump's global tariffs struck down by US Supreme Court by AuryGlenz on Friday February 20, 2026 @01:05PM (#47091499)
Both of which (especially Virginia) are much more egregious than what happened in Texas, and it’s not like gerrymandering is new to either side. I’m not sure which side you think has a “behavioral floor,” but the answer is neither other than what we hold them to, so don’t excuse “your side.”
Re:Trump's global tariffs struck down by US Supreme Court by ceejayoz on Friday February 20, 2026 @01:09PM (#47091543)
> Both of which (especially Virginia) are much more egregious than what happened in Texas…

"Mom, he punched me back after I sucker-punched him!"

Re:Trump's global tariffs struck down by US Supreme Court by AuryGlenz on Friday February 20, 2026 @11:15PM (#47097441)
It's more like "Mom, he punched me after I punched him after he punched me after I punched him after he punched me after..."

Nobody would have cared about Texas' gerrymandering except for Trump (stupidly) called for it - pretty much every political party has done it in their state over the years, but it's generally been gently putting their finger on the scale. But now that someone that half of the country have been convinced is literally Hitler had a part in it they feel like they can go absolutely wild with it. Everyone should be mad when gerrymandering happens, whether it helps your side or not. Representatives that feel absolutely secure in their seats are bad at their jobs, whether they're on your side or not. Going so hogwild in 'retribution' isn't virtuous.

Re:Trump's global tariffs struck down by US Supreme Court by myvoiceismypass on Friday February 20, 2026 @02:10PM (#47092430)
How is the citizen-voted CA response - contingent entirely on Texas actually implementing - "much more egregious than what happened in Texas"?
Re:Trump's global tariffs struck down by US Supreme Court by AuryGlenz on Friday February 20, 2026 @11:09PM (#47097411)
Because the Texas redistricting hopes to bring the Democrats seats down from 13 to to 8, but a lot of those could still easily go either way. California made theirs to also pick up 5 but theirs are more sure. Virginia is the real whopper, where a purple state will move to all seats but one for Democrats instead of the reasonable almost down the middle split they now have.

I'm not defending what was done in Texas. Gerrymandering is gross. But I do hate how the discourse seems to be that Texas started it. They absolutely didn't. Neither party can be blamed for that, and this tit and tat back and forth is the wrong way to deal with it - so are so called "nonpartisan" committees, by the way. It's easy for a nonpartisan committee to quickly become quite partisan. What I wish would have happened is that there was a real dialogue about better fixes for the problem, but instead it became political mudslinging.

Easy part solution - put mathematical limits on the geometry. It wouldn't eliminate gerrymandering but it would certainly help.