News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The path to ubiquitous AI (17k tokens/sec) by sfn42 on Friday February 20, 2026 @10:43AM (#47089436)
Yes there are some fascinating emergent properties at play, but when they fail it's blatantly obvious that there's no actual intelligence nor understanding. They are very cool and very useful tools, I use them on a daily basis now and the way I can just paste a vague screenshot with some vague text and they get it and give a useful response blows my mind every time. But it's very clear that it's all just smoke and mirrors, they're not intelligent and you can't trust them with anything.
Re:The path to ubiquitous AI (17k tokens/sec) by pennomi on Friday February 20, 2026 @11:01AM (#47089716)
When humans fail a task, it’s obvious there is no actual intelligence nor understanding.

Intelligence is not as cool as you think it is.

Re:The path to ubiquitous AI (17k tokens/sec) by sfn42 on Friday February 20, 2026 @11:13AM (#47089898)
I assure you, intelligence is very cool.
Re:The path to ubiquitous AI (17k tokens/sec) by swftarrow on Saturday February 21, 2026 @07:45AM (#47100309)
It can still be cool- but maybe it's just not as rare.
Re:The path to ubiquitous AI (17k tokens/sec) by atomicthumbs on Friday February 20, 2026 @09:20PM (#47096835)
you'd think with how often Opus builds two separate code paths without feature parity when you try to vibe code something complex, people wouldn't regard this whole thing so highly