News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Ladybird: Closing this as we are no longer pursuing Swift... by stephc_int13 on Thursday February 19, 2026 @12:10AM (#47070156)
C.
Re:Ladybird: Closing this as we are no longer pursuing Swift... by addaon on Thursday February 19, 2026 @12:32AM (#47070284)
C's a great language in 1985, and a great starting point. But development of UI software is one of those areas where object oriented software really shines. What if we could get all the advantages of C as a procedural language, but graft on top an extremely lightweight object system with a spec of < 20 pages to take advantage of these new 1980s-era developments in software engineering, while keeping 100% of the maturity and performance of the C ecosystem? We could call it Objective-C.
Re:Ladybird: Closing this as we are no longer pursuing Swift... by mpweiher on Monday February 23, 2026 @04:33PM (#47129190)
And Objective-C is C. A strict superset, in fact.

If

   [aView display];
really, really, really isn't to your liking, you can write

   objc_msgSend( aView, @selector(display)); 
or even:

   objc_msgSend( aView, sel_registerName("display"));
That's pretty much all there is to it. But I have to admit I like the syntax better:

   [aView display];
Re:Ladybird: Closing this as we are no longer pursuing Swift... by addaon on Monday February 23, 2026 @05:17PM (#47129797)
(Hi mpw)
Re:Ladybird: Closing this as we are no longer pursuing Swift... by mpweiher on Tuesday February 24, 2026 @07:11AM (#47136138)
(Hi Adam, how's the flying?)