News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Thousands of CEOs just admitted AI had no impact on emplo... by LunaSea on Wednesday February 18, 2026 @05:48AM (#47059637)
Security auditor and criminals have a bright future ahead of them.
Re:Thousands of CEOs just admitted AI had no impact on emplo... by mikkupikku on Wednesday February 18, 2026 @06:35AM (#47059958)
For a few years maybe, but I see little reason to think this stuff won't be coming for their jobs as well.
Re:Thousands of CEOs just admitted AI had no impact on emplo... by docmars on Wednesday February 18, 2026 @10:06AM (#47061743)
True, but you'd be surprised how much you can tighten up a codebase by asking a heftier model to do a security review and suggest fixes.
Re:Thousands of CEOs just admitted AI had no impact on emplo... by fastasucan on Wednesday February 18, 2026 @11:03AM (#47062475)
At what point do people really know if it has been tightened up if they never look at the code?
Re:Thousands of CEOs just admitted AI had no impact on emplo... by XenophileJKO on Wednesday February 18, 2026 @01:40PM (#47064539)
How does a PM know that the code has been tighten up by the offshore team?
Re:Thousands of CEOs just admitted AI had no impact on emplo... by docmars on Friday February 20, 2026 @06:50PM (#47095722)
That's the catch -- a team would need to care enough about quality, or don't at their own peril.
Re:Thousands of CEOs just admitted AI had no impact on emplo... by XenophileJKO on Wednesday February 18, 2026 @12:49PM (#47063865)
That is why I said "risk". Though the models are pretty good "if" you ask for security audits. Notice I didn't say you could do it without technical knowledge right now, so you need to know to ask for security review.

I have friends in security on major platforms who are impressed by the security review of the SOT models. Certainly better than the average bootstrapped founder.