Re:Thousands of CEOs just admitted AI had no impact on emplo...
by LunaSea on Wednesday February 18, 2026 @05:48AM
(#47059637)
Security auditor and criminals have a bright future ahead of them.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Thousands of CEOs just admitted AI had no impact on emplo...
by mikkupikku on Wednesday February 18, 2026 @06:35AM
(#47059958)
For a few years maybe, but I see little reason to think this stuff won't be coming for their jobs as well.
Re:Thousands of CEOs just admitted AI had no impact on emplo...
by docmars on Wednesday February 18, 2026 @10:06AM
(#47061743)
True, but you'd be surprised how much you can tighten up a codebase by asking a heftier model to do a security review and suggest fixes.
Re:Thousands of CEOs just admitted AI had no impact on emplo...
by fastasucan on Wednesday February 18, 2026 @11:03AM
(#47062475)
At what point do people really know if it has been tightened up if they never look at the code?
Re:Thousands of CEOs just admitted AI had no impact on emplo...
by XenophileJKO on Wednesday February 18, 2026 @01:40PM
(#47064539)
How does a PM know that the code has been tighten up by the offshore team?
Re:Thousands of CEOs just admitted AI had no impact on emplo...
by docmars on Friday February 20, 2026 @06:50PM
(#47095722)
That's the catch -- a team would need to care enough about quality, or don't at their own peril.
Re:Thousands of CEOs just admitted AI had no impact on emplo...
by XenophileJKO on Wednesday February 18, 2026 @12:49PM
(#47063865)
That is why I said "risk". Though the models are pretty good "if" you ask for security audits. Notice I didn't say you could do it without technical knowledge right now, so you need to know to ask for security review.
I have friends in security on major platforms who are impressed by the security review of the SOT models. Certainly better than the average bootstrapped founder.