News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Qwen3.5: Towards Native Multimodal Agents by doodlesdev on Monday February 16, 2026 @09:59AM (#47035838)
GPT 4o was also terrible at ARC AGI, but it's one of the most loved models of the last few years. Honestly, I'm a huge fan of the ARC AGI series of benchmarks, but I don't believe it corresponds directly to the types of qualities that most people assess whenever using LLMs.
Re:Qwen3.5: Towards Native Multimodal Agents by nananana9 on Monday February 16, 2026 @12:10PM (#47037525)
It was terrible at a lot of things, it was beloved because when you say "I think I'm the reincarnation of Jesus Christ" it will tell you "You know what... I think I believe it! I genuinely think you're the kind of person that appears once every few millenia to reshape the world!"
Re:Qwen3.5: Towards Native Multimodal Agents by mrybczyn on Monday February 16, 2026 @11:36AM (#47037083)
because arc agi involves de novo reasoning over a restricted and (hopefully) unpretrained territory, in 2d space. not many people use LLMs as more than a better wikipedia,stack overflow, or autocomplete....
Re:Qwen3.5: Towards Native Multimodal Agents by gkbrk on Tuesday February 17, 2026 @04:49AM (#47045524)
That's not because 4o is good at things, that's because it's pretty much the most sycophantic model and people easily fall for a model incorrectly agreeing with them then a model correctly calling them out.