doodlesdev
I very much like Steam features aimed at helping me discover new games, since I find that nowadays I'm having much more difficulty navigating through all of the option to find something interesting to play, as I'm not investing as much time gaming as I used to when I was younger.
Any fellow HNers have cool suggestions? I keep hearing about Factorio and Satisfactory here, but not much else.
Ask HN: Is Firefox on Android Secure? - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36671251
Site Isolation in Firefox - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27196526
Improved Process Isolation in Firefox 100 - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31355857
Firefox – Site Isolation (Fission) Goes Live on Android
TruffleRuby – High performance implementation of Ruby
Funnily enough, regarding SoftTalker's point, just a few hours after my original comment, CVE-2026-110264 (a CVSS 10.0... worse than PHP's RCE) rolled in for GitLab, which would be prevented by using a memory safe language to write the interpreter instead of C.
Meanwhile, there are different threat models to any type of web application, it's just that PHP has repeatedly failed us in any threat model, same as C in most threat models that don't involve compiling it to WASM or running it air-gapped.
Leaving memory unsafe runtimes and interpreters directly available to public web traffic is a liability I don't want for me and users don't deserve to face the consequences of it whenever they are trusting you with their data. Rust and Golang even with all of their design issues should be the baseline for internet facing software nowadays.
As for the Linux kernel, everything I run on it is inside a VM (or a microVM) instead of relying on containers exclusively, because I can't trust a C kernel to not have vulnerabilities.
It's time to abandon PHP and C-based software (i.e. PHP). The clock's ticking.
DeepSeek v4.1 Flash 1017 available in OpenCode Go and Free
Defer, Panic, and Recover – The Go Blog
edit: just a few hours after this comment I got access to Gemini 4 on the Gemini app. Yayy! :)
In that case, the Pi Zero 2 W ought to be enough, as its Cortex processor is leaps and bounds better, with a quad-core vs the Pi Zero's single-core, low IPC ARM CPU.
Crazy times we live in :)
OP was talking about datacenters in residential areas and quoted the 90db @ 100m value, which indeed is 70dB @ 1km distance, which is absolutely absurd and would make it impossible to live nearby. That's the original comment I've answered.
Then, OP edited the post and said it was 90dB @ 10m, which means 50dB @ 1000m, an okayish value (depending on the type and duration of the noise), but that's not a distance we were talking about before.
I know datacenters in my city that are less than 500m from residential zoning (I should note I'm not in the US and this is not a new datacenter), so I didn't think that the original (distance) measurement sounded absurd, that's why I pointed out how much the (noise) measurement seemed to be out-of-scale.
Anyways, I think OP's measures where just completely made up or misremembered, because I'm any way I've framed the data (and the edited data), it doesn't match my personal observations around the few datacenters I've been to nor the data that's been released.
I did agree about the possibility of low-frequency noises being a huge nuisance, though, as those types of noises feel much worse than random noises at random intervals at higher dB.
I still heard almost nothing ~20m from it, but neither I (nor the company who built it) knew what kinds of workloads ran there and I suspect it was mostly traditional workloads.
> I've read reports from people living near data centers having almost constant 60-70dB noise levels at their houses, which, yeah, it still shouldn't fly.
So, first of all, I agree, that's still top much. But I think it's important to point out that 60dB is, _literally_, 1.000 less than what OP was claiming (90dB).I absolutely believe that there's leftover noise around the facilities, too, specially low-frequency humming for electrical equipment, but I have yet to see _actual_ reporting demonstrating newer AI-centered datacenters produce even near the amount of noise OP was claiming.
> Noise level ~10m outside a facility is 90dB.
That would mean 130dB of noise inside the facility, which sounds (pun intended) impossible to me, no matter how bad the acoustic planning is.edit: just understood what "Extra zero" meant. The original comment before being edited said 100m and that's what I was quoting.
> At 100m, it often exceeds the 90dB threshold for hearing loss.
This is absolutely false. Those are the noise levels _inside_ the facilities. Noise attenuates by inverse-square law by distance. 90dB at 100 meters means 116dB at 5 meters distance... That's industrial alarms level of noise and would never fly in a residential area. > robotic garages are everywhere
Robotic WHAT? That's crazy, if it's what I'm imagining. Is Tokyo that much crowded?