News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Why I'm not worried about AI job loss by next_xibalba on Friday February 13, 2026 @09:15PM (#47010827)
Economies of scale were realized in the tv, but not the house. Maybe bc they aren’t realizable in housing, maybe bc regulation, maybe bc of the nimby veto, etc.
Re:Why I'm not worried about AI job loss by tudorconstantin on Friday February 13, 2026 @11:31PM (#47011582)
I think it’s rather because of scarcity: you can’t scale and automate land/prime-location land
Re:Why I'm not worried about AI job loss by jama211 on Saturday February 14, 2026 @02:12AM (#47012373)
Well you can scale it, which is why housing affordability is higher in many places where the cities are actually far denser than Australia. There are perverse incentives not to though, property prices don’t rise (which is what investors want) if you actually focus on increasing supply.
Re:Why I'm not worried about AI job loss by itake on Friday February 13, 2026 @11:47PM (#47011660)
People are building houses with way more features, that last longer, have better thermoregulation, and just more comfortable to live in.
Re:Why I'm not worried about AI job loss by kelipso on Saturday February 14, 2026 @12:11AM (#47011782)
Same goes for TVs too. That’s clearly not the reason why house prices rose so drastically.