Re:Lockitron exceeds $2,000,000 in reservations
by lessnonymous on Thursday October 25, 2012 @08:14PM
(#4700235)
So .. it stops physical keys from working?
Re:Lockitron exceeds $2,000,000 in reservations
by jessaustin on Thursday October 25, 2012 @11:17PM
(#4700691)
No, it doesn't. Presumably the parent is describing a situation in which a temporary guest wouldn't receive a physical key at any time, but would have temporary access through the app.
Re:Lockitron exceeds $2,000,000 in reservations
by Firehed on Thursday October 25, 2012 @11:09PM
(#4700662)
No, you just don't give them out in the first place.
Re:Lockitron exceeds $2,000,000 in reservations
by adgar2 on Thursday October 25, 2012 @11:54PM
(#4700802)
> Consider everyone who lives in an apartment who doesn't have the option of replacing their lock
I've lived in apartments. Giving other people access to your apartment is - in general - a horrible idea. I let guests into my apartment. Personally. It's a pretty straightforward workflow, believe it or not.
IIRC, you can also easily deauthorize users, so it's also the cheapest way I can think of to retrofit something into being a shared space where you want to be able to control access going forward.
It's not the perfect lock solution for every use case, but it's a really cool utility for a lot of purposes.