Firehed
This is a PHP bug: http://www.networkworld.com/news/2011/010511-php-floating-po...
Everything else? Bad code.
I would definitely charge back every unauthorized charge they make, and charge it back again if they fight it and win (yes, you can do this, and yes, it does work). It's not worth their time to fight small chargebacks at all[1], and the damage multiple chargebacks can do for even relatively large payments often makes it not worth going through multiple rounds.
Although at that point, I'd consider simply reporting the card as stolen. In effect, at that point it is. Once the PAN is marked as invalid by the issuing bank, those recurring charges should definitely not be able to go through (exception: some sort of wacky bill-pay system that bypasses the credit networks entirely; yes, these exist, although normally go the other way)
[1] As a merchant, your chargeback rate is unaffected by winning chargebacks, and the fee (typically starting at $15, and often marked up) is per-incident. Meaning if the customer fights the charge a second time after you win the chargeback, you're out $30 and now have two chargebacks in your history, not just one. Between the hard costs and whatever the human factor is in fighting the charges, it quickly becomes non-economical to fight them.
Although in this case, I imagine the real problem is portability. Curl is available pretty much everywhere. exec (or more directly, pcntl/posix extensions) aren't in any out-of-the-box installation, and anything that needs to be further daemonized to get up and running (such as gearmand and gearman-manager) are even harder to use in a one-click solution.
And contrary to your suggestion, I've certainly received plenty of harassment based on my body as a white male. Less these days as I refuse to work with people who can't act like adults, but I've taken plenty of crap about my height and physical appearance (I'm 25; lots of "oh, when do you finish high school?" kind of stuff)
I suppose this is one of those "there's a time and place" issues. I wouldn't likely call out such an asshole while I'm on stage (unless this person tried to humiliate me while I was presenting, in which case I'd simply state that's not an appropriate comment for the conference and move on to the next person), but I'd certainly escalate[1] the issue privately.
We need to look into some sort of zero-tolerance[2] policies for this kind of thing until the message that this isn't okay is clearly understood. Certainly if I'm hosting or attending a conference and witness this kind of behavior, I'll be going out of my way to get this person removed from the conference and will also bring it up with their employer.
[1] In the "I'd like to speak with a manager" sense, not throwing a loud tantrum. [2] Not that I generally support zero-tolerance policies, or find them effective. But I think the concept is directionally correct; any attendee making another attendee (including speakers) feel uncomfortable or unsafe should be removed form the event. Maybe they get one strict warning; it depends how obviously offensive they were being.
As for commenting the end of loops - that too just improves readability, especially in long functions. If your editor doesn't show invisible characters, it can be easy to lose track if some indent is part of the 'i' loop or the 'j' loop, for example (yes, that can indicate a bigger problem, but that's not the point. I'm talking about real-world code, not idealistic academic nonsense)
Moreover, you generally won't get it back until several months after you stop processing, since that's when the real risk of chargebacks goes away. Depending on your contracts and agreements, the timeframe can change significantly, including having several smaller payouts.
Seems to me that they should be treated as good-weather guidelines (legally; that's already more or less the case in practice), and focus on the people driving recklessly - weaving in and out of traffic, going 10mph+ faster than everyone else, tailgating, etc.
I got a similar message several months back, but that wasn't part of a larger leak; apparently some website I'd used a while ago had been compromised and I was using my throwaway password on Twitter at the time. Suffice to say, it's using a real one now - fifty-some-odd characters of random garbage generated and stored by 1Password. It's never been used anywhere else, so getting this email a second time just now was quite a shock (this time, my reaction was "really guys, again?" rather than "wtf?")
To their credit, they caught the first instance crazy-fast (my password had been reset automatically within about five mintes of a rogue tweet, though not before a friend texted me about it). This time I didn't see any activity at all, so I assume it was more proactive.
I'd still like an MFA option, especially with how infrequently I actually log in to twitter. However, I do like the "check your OAuth grants" page you're taken to after changing your password.
However I can't remember where I read that and could be totally wrong.
@$arr['key']
is the same as $er = error_reporting(0);
$arr['$key'];
error_reporting($er);
unset($er);
Probably more importantly is that the internal errors are still being raised, there's just additional comparison logic within the PHP engine to suppress them internally.Heck, the second Google hit for "php mvc framework" for me was a 2009 guide to writing your own (talk about not getting the point of a framework). There were two more pages in the top ten for PHP MVC framework comparisons.
If you echo HTML, you get HTML. If you echo binary data, you get binary data. JSON, XML (including SOAP bodies), text, nothing at all, file i/o, direct socket connections, exit codes - all are supported equally well. The only thing vaguely related is the HTTP headers that you get for free if you're running it behind a fastcgi module (apache's mod_php, nginx/php-fpm, etc).
I strongly disagree with your implication that it's only useful as a presentation layer, however. Some quirky syntax doesn't at all make it an incapable language; the real problem in my eyes is there's no one go-to framework for MVC work, a la Rails or Django (there's no shortage of choices, but that's not necessarily a good thing).
This, of course, is equally true for watching any violent movie, and even just the news these days. But don't let that get in the way of some good sensationalism.
If you don't check your configs when moving to a new host, you get what's coming to you.
Hire the $2600/hr guy and be done in ten minutes because of his fifteen years experience and deep knowledge of the system; spend $433 very quickly. Pick the $50/hr rent-an-intern and you're down for a day while they're googling the fixes. Spend about the same amount, but avoid the losses from 7+ extra hours of downtime.
Time is money, after all.
Same thing with an after-hours/emergency call to a plumber. Yes, you'll spend twice as much - but that's nothing compared to what it will cost to repair the structural damage to your house because your toilet overflowed and you ended up with three inches of standing water soaking into your everything.
Perhaps Jobs started that process, but I'm sure it still exists with him gone.