Re:The Singularity Will Occur on a Tuesday
by grogenaut on Wednesday February 11, 2026 @07:54AM
(#46974361)
I can bake a cake while having 0 understanding of the chemistry that powers the transformation. One is a pile of wet flour, the other is delicious.
A dog can create a snack by doing a trick. Doesn't mean that there isn't some mechanism going on there that neither of them understand.
Re:The Singularity Will Occur on a Tuesday
by beepbooptheory on Wednesday February 11, 2026 @08:32AM
(#46974739)
Whose argument is this supposed to be furthering here? You didn't specify what the wet flour is? What is the point of this contribution?
OTOH, an LLM is just a token prediction engine. It fully and completely covers it. There is no lower level secrets hidden in the design nobody understands, because it could not have been created if there was. The fact that the output can be surprising is not evidence of anything, we have always had surprising outputs like funny bugs or unexpected features. Using the word "emergence" for this is just deceitful.
This algorithm has fundamental limitations and they have not been getting better, if you look closely. For instance you could vibe code a C compiler now, but it's 80% there, cute trick but not usable in real world. Just like anything, it cannot be economically vibe coded to 100%. They are not going back and vibe coding the previous simpler projects to 100% with "improved" models. Instead they are just vibe coding something bigger to 80%. This is not an improvement in limitations, it is actually communicating between the lines that the limitations cannot be overcome.
Also, enshittification has not even started yet.