Re:Gmail Adds Multiple Inboxes
by amix on Friday February 06, 2009 @10:31AM
(#469817)
It's kind of inspiring that they keep innovating or at least try to innovate with such an old product. I wonder how many engineers they have working on Gmail, does anybody know this?
Re:Gmail Adds Multiple Inboxes
by andreyf on Friday February 06, 2009 @10:58AM
(#469869)
It might be old, but it's certainly very widely used - both inside of the company and out.
Also, GMail is becoming more than mail - it's becoming the new desktop, in a way - with integration into mail, chat, calendar, and tasks... What they're doing with widgets will significantly change things, also. For example, Twitter can be integrated in one of those chat-box-like views.
Re:Gmail Adds Multiple Inboxes
by sgk284 on Friday February 06, 2009 @01:48PM
(#470139)
I used to work on Google Translator, and the GMail team was very close in proximity to us. It's more than 10 engineers but probably less than 30... can't give you an actual count. But I do remember a whole bunch of them crazies running around trying to get us to be in their videos that they record (I'm not sure how many they've released, but I'm sure you've seen the one with the traveling envelope).
Re:Gmail Adds Multiple Inboxes
by ryanwaggoner on Friday February 06, 2009 @05:01PM
(#470448)
Off-topic, but seriously, what the fuck is digg doing with all their people and money? They've got a huge team and every time I venture over there, everything looks pretty much the same. Do they realize that digg is a sinking ship and they're all building lifeboats?
Re:Gmail Adds Multiple Inboxes
by enomar on Friday February 06, 2009 @12:49PM
(#470024)
I personally have no interest in multiple inboxes. It's great that my gmail UX doesn't have to change for others to get this feature. Too often, products make everyone suffer in order to provide a feature that 10% of the users "must have". I only hope they can do the same thing to appease the people that "can't live" without folders.
Re:Gmail Adds Multiple Inboxes
by brianm on Friday February 06, 2009 @03:30PM
(#470298)
I deactivated on first turning it on, then next day turned it back on and spent some time.
Right now I have three panes, stacked vertically. One is the inbox, one is unread messages with a particular label (which i really had been treating as a second inbox), and third is starred.
In a morning of using it this way It has been very useful, and I find myself actually using the starring function much better.
Stacking vertically made a big difference for me, as I skim subjects and the horizontal layout didn't leave enough subject.
Re:Gmail Adds Multiple Inboxes
by CalmQuiet on Friday February 06, 2009 @11:00AM
(#469873)
Most importantly, their filtering, labeling, and displaying options make a huge improvement on the bane of my internet life: email overload. Finally hundreds of emails a day are approaching manageable. Yes: thank you for continuing development on gmail.
Re:Gmail Adds Multiple Inboxes
by mattmaroon on Friday February 06, 2009 @11:02PM
(#470777)
Or you could just add folders like everyone has asked you to since you launched the service, then display the tree like Outlook does for easy browsing while not removing the reading pane. Just a thought.
Also, GMail is becoming more than mail - it's becoming the new desktop, in a way - with integration into mail, chat, calendar, and tasks... What they're doing with widgets will significantly change things, also. For example, Twitter can be integrated in one of those chat-box-like views.
http://mail.google.com/mail/help/join_the_team.html
http://www.procmail.org/procmail.HISTORY.html
Right now I have three panes, stacked vertically. One is the inbox, one is unread messages with a particular label (which i really had been treating as a second inbox), and third is starred.
In a morning of using it this way It has been very useful, and I find myself actually using the starring function much better.
Stacking vertically made a big difference for me, as I skim subjects and the horizontal layout didn't leave enough subject.