Re:The US is flirting with its first-ever population decline
by showerst on Tuesday February 10, 2026 @11:46AM
(#46962616)
Minus the commute you had to do most of that anyway though, right? We get my four year old ready and walk her to school (city free pre-k a few blocks away, plus paid aftercare).
It takes about an hour to get breakfasted, dressed, and ready which we would be doing anyway. Counting the walk both ways it's about 30 minutes of extra time for 8 hours of childcare.
Unless your commute is just huge I can't see that math being true.
Re:The US is flirting with its first-ever population decline
by bombcar on Tuesday February 10, 2026 @11:52AM
(#46962757)
You got 8 hours out of it, we get maybe three - because of how it works out.
Add in infants and toddlers, and the fact that many places seem to do childcare for a very particular age range, and it can get hectic.
Workable, of course, anything is, but hectic. It can be understandable why people look at it from the outside and say "wow, that's a lot of kids, too many for me."
Re:The US is flirting with its first-ever population decline
by showerst on Tuesday February 10, 2026 @12:19PM
(#46963282)
Yeah, haha fair. Even my friends with two look noticeably shell shocked most of the time. Good luck =)
Re:The US is flirting with its first-ever population decline
by disgruntledphd2 on Wednesday February 11, 2026 @11:43AM
(#46977231)
Two kids are exponentially harder than one. Apparently it gets easier with three, but definitely not worth checking that out.
We certainly take advantage of things like free preschool; but if we look at it objectively (and ignore benefits to the child) it consumes more time than if we didn't use it - getting him ready, walking him to school, picking him up, etc. Since it's free, we look at "time spent" and it's something like 2-3 hours spent to "get" 3 hours.