News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Claude's C Compiler vs. GCC by marcus_holmes on Monday February 09, 2026 @03:23AM (#46942921)
Anthropic said they vibe-coded a C compiler that could compile the Linux kernel. That's what they said. No-one forced them to say that. They could have picked another code base.

It turns out that isn't true in all instances, as this article demonstrates. I'm not nearly expert enough to be able to decide if that error was simple, stupid, irrelevant, or whatever. I can make a call on whether it successfully compiled the Linux kernel: it did not.

Re:Claude's C Compiler vs. GCC by red75prime on Monday February 09, 2026 @04:25AM (#46943332)
I'm sorry for being excessively edgy, but "it's useless" is not a good summary for "linking errors after successfully compiling Linux kernel for x86_64."
Re:Claude's C Compiler vs. GCC by VMG on Monday February 09, 2026 @04:37AM (#46943410)
> Because if it’s worth your time to lie, it’s worth my time to correct it.

https://www.astralcodexten.com/p/if-its-worth-your-time-to-l...