Re:The Waymo World Model: A New Frontier for Autonomous Driv...
by thefounder on Friday February 06, 2026 @02:37PM
(#46917155)
But somehow google fails to execute. Gemini is useless for programming and I don’t think even bother to use it as chat app. Claude code + gpt 5.2 xhigh for coding and gpt as chat app are really the only ones that are worth it(price and time wise)
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:The Waymo World Model: A New Frontier for Autonomous Driv...
by unsupp0rted on Friday February 06, 2026 @04:16PM
(#46918248)
[delayed]
Re:The Waymo World Model: A New Frontier for Autonomous Driv...
by coffeemug on Friday February 06, 2026 @02:40PM
(#46917179)
I've recently switched to Claude for chat. GPT 5.2 feels very engagement-maxxed for me, like I'm reading a bad LinkedIn post. Claude does a tiny bit of this too, but an order of magnitude less in my experience. I never thought I'd switch from ChatGPT, but there is only so much "here's the brutal truth, it's not x it's y" I can take.
Re:The Waymo World Model: A New Frontier for Autonomous Driv...
by thefounder on Friday February 06, 2026 @03:47PM
(#46917925)
To me ChatGPT seems smarter and knows more. That’s why I use it. Even Claude rates gpt better for knowledge answers. Not sure if that itself is any indication. Claude seems superficial unless you hammer it to generate a good answer.
Re:The Waymo World Model: A New Frontier for Autonomous Driv...
by thechao on Friday February 06, 2026 @02:49PM
(#46917281)
GPT likes to argue, and most of its arguments are straw man arguments, usually conflating priors. It's ... exhausting; akin to arguing on the internet. (What am I even saying, here!?) Claude's a lot less of that. I don't know if tracks discussion/conversation better; but, for damn sure, it's got way less verbal diarrhea than GPT.
Re:The Waymo World Model: A New Frontier for Autonomous Driv...
by mrlongroots on Friday February 06, 2026 @03:08PM
(#46917518)
Yes, GPT5-series thinking models are extremely pedantic and tedious. Any conversation with them is derailed because they start nitpicking something random.
But Codex/5.2 was substantially more effective than Claude at debugging complex C++ bugs until around Fall, when I was writing a lot more code.
I find Gemini 3 useless. It has regressed on hallucinations from Gemini 2.5, to the point where its output is no better than a random token stream despite all its benchmark outperformance. I would use Gemini 2.5 to help write papers and all, can't see to use Gemini 3 for anything. Gemini CLI also is very non-compliant and crazy.
Re:The Waymo World Model: A New Frontier for Autonomous Driv...
by aschla on Friday February 06, 2026 @02:45PM
(#46917244)
Experiencing the same. It seems Anthropic’s human-focused design choices are becoming a differentiator.
Re:The Waymo World Model: A New Frontier for Autonomous Driv...
by henryfjordan on Friday February 06, 2026 @02:54PM
(#46917349)
Gemini works well enough in Search and in Meet. And it's baked into the products so it's dead simple to use.
I don't think Google is targeting developers with their AI, they are targeting their product's users.
Re:The Waymo World Model: A New Frontier for Autonomous Driv...
by noelsusman on Friday February 06, 2026 @03:02PM
(#46917442)
It is a bit mind boggling how behind they were considering they invented transformers and were also sitting on the best set of training data in the world, but they've caught up quite a bit. They still lag behind in coding, but I've found Gemini to be pretty good at more general knowledge tasks. Flash 3 in particular is much better than anything of comparable price and speed from OpenAI or Anthropic.
Re:The Waymo World Model: A New Frontier for Autonomous Driv...
by ody4242 on Saturday February 07, 2026 @05:56AM
(#46922855)
Yesterday GPT 5.2 wrote a python function for me that had the import in the middle of the code, for no reason. (It was a simple import of requests module in a REST client...)
Claude I agree is a lot better for backend,Gemini is very good for frontend