Re:Opus 4.6 uncovers 500 zero-day flaws in open-source code
by wiseowise on Thursday February 05, 2026 @04:03PM
(#46905285)
Not sure if trolling or serious.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Opus 4.6 uncovers 500 zero-day flaws in open-source code
by IhateAI_2 on Thursday February 05, 2026 @04:14PM
(#46905423)
These people are serious, and delusional. Openclaw hasn't contributed anything to the economy other than burning electricity and probably more interest on delusional folks credit card bills.
Re:Opus 4.6 uncovers 500 zero-day flaws in open-source code
by falcor84 on Thursday February 05, 2026 @05:40PM
(#46906434)
Yes, serious. Even if openclaw is entirely useless (which I didn't think it is), it's still a good idea to harden it and make people's computers safer from attack, no? I don't see anyone objecting to fixing vulnerabilities in Angry Birds.
Re:Opus 4.6 uncovers 500 zero-day flaws in open-source code
by wiseowise on Thursday February 05, 2026 @05:58PM
(#46906619)
> that's enormous economic value
> OpenClaw's massive adoption.
I was talking about those two.
Re:Opus 4.6 uncovers 500 zero-day flaws in open-source code
by falcor84 on Thursday February 05, 2026 @06:03PM
(#46906672)
Here's the chain of the thread:
>Opus 4.6 uncovers 500 zero-day flaws in open-source code
>Just 100 from the 500 is from OpenClaw created by Opus 4.5
>Well, even then, that's enormous economic value, given OpenClaw's massive adoption.
I'm arguing that because OpenClaw is installed on so many computers, uncovering the vulnerabilities in it offers enormous economic value, as opposed to letting them get exploited by malicious actors. I don't understand why this is controversial.