How would you generate a picture of Noun + Noun in the first place in order to train the LLM with what it would look like? What's happening during that 1 estimated second?
This is why everyone trains their LLM on another LLM. It's all about the pelicans.
Re:Claude Opus 4.6
by metalliqaz on Thursday February 05, 2026 @04:51PM
(#46905897)
its pelicans all the way down
Use any of the image generation models (eg Nanobanana, Midjourney, or ChatGPT) to generate a picture of a noun on a noun. Simonw's test is to have a Language (text) model generate a Scalar Vector Graphic, which the language model has to do by writing curves and colors, like draw a spline from point 150,100 to 200,300 of type cubic, using width 20, color orange.
In that hypothetical second is freaking fascinating. It's a denoising algorithm, and then a bunch of linear algebra, and out pops a picture of a pelican on a bicycle. Stable diffusion does this quite handily. https://stablediffusionweb.com/image/6520628-pelican-bicycle...
Re:Claude Opus 4.6
by AnimalMuppet on Thursday February 05, 2026 @04:28PM
(#46905634)
But you need to also include the number of prepositions. "A pelican on a bicycle" is not at all the same as "a pelican inside a bicycle".
There are estimated to be 100 or so prepositions in English. That gets you to 4 trillion combinations.
Re:Claude Opus 4.6
by jodrellblank on Friday February 06, 2026 @10:41AM
(#46914170)
The prompt was "a pelican riding a bicycle"; not prepositions but every verb. Potentially every adverb+verb combination - "a pelican clumsily pushing a bicycle"
> there are approximately 200k common nouns in English, and then we square that, we get 40 billion combinations. At one second per, that's ~1200 years, but then if we parallelize it on a supercomputer that can do 100,000 per second that would only take 3 days. Given that ChatGPT was trained on all of the Internet and every book written, I'm not sure that still seems infeasible.
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45455786