Re:Under the hood of Windows 8, or why desktop users should ...
by joenathan on Tuesday October 23, 2012 @01:27PM
(#4689138)
Yeah but these are easier and fully featured/integrated(think for example notifications). Also given my heavy use of Firefox and Chrome, think 100+ tabs spread out in multiple windows & never ending sessions, it's many times easier with casual things to use a Metro app then open additional windows or tabs.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Under the hood of Windows 8, or why desktop users should ...
by mertd on Tuesday October 23, 2012 @01:39PM
(#4689183)
I'm not sure I follow. There is nothing preventing the desktop software from using a system-wide notification system.
FWIW, metro apps are not fully featured but rather feature crippled. Take Chrome's metro version for example. It is just the forced-fullscreen version of the desktop one. You can still open insane amount of tabs.
Re:Under the hood of Windows 8, or why desktop users should ...
by joenathan on Tuesday October 23, 2012 @02:21PM
(#4689421)
>There is nothing preventing the desktop software from using a system-wide notification system.
But there is already one integrated into Windows 8, there is also sharing and searching integrated
Sharing
http://i.minus.com/ixWDWz6QqMRvG.jpg
Searching
http://i.minus.com/ieIlX6e9QyL16.jpg
shifting search to a different app/service with a click
http://i.minus.com/i8CxZ5i2wILEW.jpg
I'm not trying to become the Windows 8 advocate here but just showing how it has utility and value in many uses for me.
Re:Under the hood of Windows 8, or why desktop users should ...
by jiggy2011 on Tuesday October 23, 2012 @02:00PM
(#4689293)
I think perhaps the issue is that there are more integrated "apps" available on mobile platforms. For example Netflix provide apps for iOS and Android etc but if you are using a PC they want you to go through the website.
This isn't a technical issue per se, since it would be possible to produce these apps for the desktop.
Re:Under the hood of Windows 8, or why desktop users should ...
by contextfree on Tuesday October 23, 2012 @02:38PM
(#4689582)
This is sort of reminding me of the argument that programming language features are pointless because all languages are Turing-complete anyway.