Re:Paris prosecutors raid France offices of Elon Musk's X
by master-lincoln on Wednesday February 04, 2026 @09:28AM
(#46886209)
Hard to know the intent of a picture in most cases.
E.g. there used to be a magazine for teens when I grew up showing a picture of a naked adolescent of each sex in every edition (Bravo Dr Sommer).
The intent was to educate teens and to make them feel less ashamed.
I bet there were people who used these for sexual gratification. Should that have been a reason to ban them? I don't think so.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Paris prosecutors raid France offices of Elon Musk's X
by mnewme on Wednesday February 04, 2026 @03:54PM
(#46891629)
Educational nudity where the subject consented possible for teenagers over 16 in Germany (and the publication complied with the law) is not the same category as CSAM or non-consensual sexual imagery. In the former, misuse by a minority doesn’t automatically make the publication illegal. In the latter, the harm is intrinsic: a child cannot legally consent, and non-consensual sexual images are a direct rights violation.
Re:Paris prosecutors raid France offices of Elon Musk's X
by direwolf20 on Wednesday February 04, 2026 @04:37PM
(#46892147)
Do you think the judge is stupid? The naked kid pics aren't printed in an anatomical textbook. Because they're AI hallucinations, I doubt they're even anatomically correct.