Re:Paris prosecutors raid France offices of Elon Musk's X
by myrmidon on Wednesday February 04, 2026 @04:23AM
(#46883524)
In such a case specifically: Uncover internal communication that shows the company was aware of the problem and ignored it, which presumably affects liability a lot.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Paris prosecutors raid France offices of Elon Musk's X
by ndr on Wednesday February 04, 2026 @04:35AM
(#46883621)
I wonder what they will find. They seemed to have acknowledged working on the problem before.
Re:Paris prosecutors raid France offices of Elon Musk's X
by verdverm on Wednesday February 04, 2026 @09:08AM
(#46885970)
Have you seen some of the stuff in the Enron or Epstein emails? They can be rather candid and act as if there is nothing to hide or they will never get caught
Elites need a reckoning
Re:Paris prosecutors raid France offices of Elon Musk's X
by YetAnotherNick on Thursday February 05, 2026 @12:30AM
(#46896031)
Do you think they communicate via paper? Raiding office doesn't automatically gives them access to mail/slack etc. And internal comms could be asked for without the nuclear option of raiding the office
Re:Paris prosecutors raid France offices of Elon Musk's X
by myrmidon on Thursday February 05, 2026 @04:15AM
(#46897558)
I'd expect to find most of the incriminating stuff in emails and short messages.
> And internal comms could be asked for without the nuclear option of raiding the office
Relying on the accused to compile and provide evidence seems naive to me.
Re:Paris prosecutors raid France offices of Elon Musk's X
by YetAnotherNick on Thursday February 05, 2026 @06:28AM
(#46898520)
Companies are required by law to enable persistence. And in any case if we assume malice how would the police even get access to all emails by raiding if the message and mails are stored in cloud.
AFAIK police can just ask google/slack for the mails with proper warrant.