News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Court Filings: ICE App Identifies Protesters; Global Entr... by JumpCrisscross on Friday January 30, 2026 @10:53PM (#46833263)
> Guess who runs borders and immigration, which is the use case for PreCheck and Global Entry?

Not ICE?

> Guess who has essentially unlimited jurisdictional limits? ICE.

ICE thinks that. The courts are disagreeing.

Re:Court Filings: ICE App Identifies Protesters; Global Entr... by lazide on Friday January 30, 2026 @10:57PM (#46833286)
First question - CBP, as noted.

Unlimited jurisdictional limits - and the courts will enforce this with whose army? As it were.

ICE isn’t allowed to act on citizens either, and yet here we are.

Re:Court Filings: ICE App Identifies Protesters; Global Entr... by JumpCrisscross on Friday January 30, 2026 @11:41PM (#46833569)
> ICE isn’t allowed to act on citizens

By law or policy?

Re:Court Filings: ICE App Identifies Protesters; Global Entr... by 5ykh on Saturday January 31, 2026 @12:51AM (#46833869)
It’s not legal to deport U.S. citizens but they have anyway. A judge in Minnesota has said that ICE has violated around 100 court orders. We are living in a personalist dictatorship. The courts are ignored when their rulings are inconvenient.
Re:Court Filings: ICE App Identifies Protesters; Global Entr... by JumpCrisscross on Saturday January 31, 2026 @01:19AM (#46833985)
This doesn’t even remotely address the question.
Re:Court Filings: ICE App Identifies Protesters; Global Entr... by lazide on Saturday January 31, 2026 @02:04AM (#46834188)
Not who you are responding too, but I tried to look up the legal justifications behind ICE and it’s a mess. Good luck untangling it!
Re:Court Filings: ICE App Identifies Protesters; Global Entr... by 5ykh on Saturday January 31, 2026 @07:27AM (#46836030)
The answer to your question is irrelevant. ICE does whatever the dictator tells it to. Legal basis vs. policy basis no longer matters.

The question you asked, as pointed out, is a non sequitor given the reality of what’s going on.

Re:Court Filings: ICE App Identifies Protesters; Global Entr... by JumpCrisscross on Saturday January 31, 2026 @01:51PM (#46839503)
> The question you asked, as pointed out, is a non sequitor

Not what non sequitur means nor how it’s spelled. And repeating a point in the same comment doesn’t count as pointing it out previously.

To the extent there is non sequitur in this thread, it’s in jumping into a legal discussion halfway to argue the law doesn’t actually matter because you feel like it.

Re:Court Filings: ICE App Identifies Protesters; Global Entr... by 5ykh on Saturday January 31, 2026 @02:07PM (#46839693)
Ah. My bad spelling. That is a great, pertinent thing to point out. I did abuse the meaning of non sequitor. I was trying to convey a sense that is lost on you without writing a treatise. The law doesn’t matter because we are living in a personaist dictatorship. Asking for the policy or legal basis of ICE’s actions is pointless and ignores the reality that ICE doesn’t care about this and no authority in the country is willing and/or able to stop their abuses.
Re:Court Filings: ICE App Identifies Protesters; Global Entr... by laughing_man on Saturday January 31, 2026 @04:22AM (#46834908)
That last part isn't true. Citizens who impede ICE officers in the performance of their duties can be arrested by ICE. That is specifically written into the law, and it's a statute that can be interpreted pretty broadly.
Re:Court Filings: ICE App Identifies Protesters; Global Entr... by lazide on Sunday February 01, 2026 @03:22AM (#46844494)
Why do you think that specific sub case that applies to all law enforcement folks, applies to my statement?
Re:Court Filings: ICE App Identifies Protesters; Global Entr... by laughing_man on Tuesday February 03, 2026 @01:42PM (#46875267)
Because ICE is law enforcement? I'm not sure what your point is.

Did you know ICE can arrest you for harboring illegal aliens?

Re:Court Filings: ICE App Identifies Protesters; Global Entr... by lazide on Wednesday February 04, 2026 @06:23AM (#46884486)
If highway patrol was spending their day harassing loiterers at the mall, everyone would be pissed.

Because 1) while they are legally allowed to do it, it isn’t their job, and 2) it is other people’s jobs.

Which is the point.