News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:GOG: Linux "the next major frontier" for gaming as it wor... by bravetraveler on Friday January 30, 2026 @05:25AM (#46822709)
Disagree, but that's fine. Only so many users, attention, etc. Heroic will probably see degradation.

They're entirely welcome to do this, I just think there's room for more opportunity with combined/open effort. Idealistic? Sure.

I'd be remiss if I didn't mention that doing nothing remains an option.

Re:GOG: Linux "the next major frontier" for gaming as it wor... by freehorse on Friday January 30, 2026 @05:27AM (#46822724)
Obligatory xkcd

https://xkcd.com/927/

Re:GOG: Linux "the next major frontier" for gaming as it wor... by bravetraveler on Friday January 30, 2026 @05:32AM (#46822749)
Yea. Good and bad, I'm exhausted. The fragmentation argument goes back to the creation of 'init'.

Cheapshot: Good Old Games (as long as our proprietary software functions)

Re:GOG: Linux "the next major frontier" for gaming as it wor... by craftkiller on Friday January 30, 2026 @07:34AM (#46823738)
> Cheapshot: Good Old Games (as long as our proprietary software functions)

False. That's literally the point of GOG. You can download the games directly from their website, install them, and run them without running any GOG software. GOG could vanish tomorrow and you'd still be able to play every game you purchased, as long as you backed up their installers somewhere.

Re:GOG: Linux "the next major frontier" for gaming as it wor... by bravetraveler on Friday January 30, 2026 @07:36AM (#46823749)
Like I said, cheap: I didn't think much about it. I've enjoyed downloading those archives. I've really enjoyed using Heroic instead.

I appreciate the first party reference and backup, but I'll stick with this for the consolidation.

Re:GOG: Linux "the next major frontier" for gaming as it wor... by craftkiller on Friday January 30, 2026 @07:39AM (#46823774)
Re:GOG: Linux "the next major frontier" for gaming as it wor... by bravetraveler on Friday January 30, 2026 @07:40AM (#46823776)
What would you prefer? I couldn't edit it now if I wanted.

Is GOG, the business entity, here to defend itself? I'd like to first express my appreciation for their efforts. Then... repeat my critical statements to them shortly after.

Oh to private/not beholden to shareholders, open to build for a ~small~ growing target that has largely moved on without you. I'm envious, really. GOG is a leader like Valve, surely!

Re:GOG: Linux "the next major frontier" for gaming as it wor... by johnnyanmac on Friday January 30, 2026 @05:41AM (#46822813)
The issue here is that this is an existing "standard", by the logic of the comic. I wouldn't be surprised if there were already unofficial Linux ports of this launcher to begin with.

Also, even if it was fragmentation I'd prefer competition to ensue. I don't want another Steam situation, even if in theory a launcher isn't holding any valuable data hostage.

Re:GOG: Linux "the next major frontier" for gaming as it wor... by bravetraveler on Friday January 30, 2026 @05:45AM (#46822836)
Eh, I don't need the comic to be a perfect fit.

It's not a port, but Heroic is an implementation of the GOG ~standard~ store as a Linux user. I will use it until I can't.

Why? Precisely because of what you say: I don't want another Steam. Heroic does others like Epic, too; open consolidation like this is my ideal.

I'm not really against GOG taking a swing. I'm comfortable calling it a reference/backup, but I do prefer something like Heroic.