News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Over 36,500 killed in Iran's deadliest massacre, document... by pydry on Wednesday January 28, 2026 @08:30AM (#46795126)
Expressing solidarity with the victims of genocide whom your government helped kill isnt a branding exercise.

Not unless you're a cynical, murderous psychopath.

It's an expression of basic human decency.

Re:Over 36,500 killed in Iran's deadliest massacre, document... by phucyucuz0 on Monday February 09, 2026 @05:38AM (#46943762)
That's using a jurisdictional defense to protect a universal claim.

If the Left's platform was explicitly "We are an anti-imperialist check on Western power" then your argument would hold. But the actual platform is usually "Women's Rights and Gay Rights are Universal Human Rights"

You cannot claim such universal moral authority when it's convenient ("Justice everywhere!") and then retreat to the safety of a particularist stance ("I only care about what my tax dollars fund!") when it's difficult.

If your "basic human decency" only activates when the aggressor is your own government, then you aren't actually standing in solidarity with the oppressed. You are implicitly arguing that a victim's value depends entirely on the nationality of their killer.

Re:Over 36,500 killed in Iran's deadliest massacre, document... by myroon5 on Thursday February 12, 2026 @12:57PM (#46992405)
> retreat [..] when it's difficult

Focusing on more tractable causes makes sense (fwiw I think there are more tractable causes than both of those geopolitical conflicts: millions and millions die annually from preventable global health ailments)