He didn't say good. I'd agree with his assessment. It's acceptable.

And for all its many flaws it does have some advantages over Meet (which is what my company switched to it from):

* Remote control of other people's desktops (except on Linux unfortunately). Meet has no solution for that. Endless "no up a bit, left.. no you had it. Third one from the top. Here let me share my screen instead".

* Conversations you have in meetings don't disappear into the aether. In fact for recurring meetings it's even clever enough to use the same chat.

* You can directly call people. Meet requires you to create a meeting and then invite someone.

Ok that's all I've got. My list of complaints is much longer, but even so it just about makes it to acceptable.

Kind of crazy that Google hasn't just solved this though. Clone Slack, integrate it with Meet. Make a high performance desktop client (not web app) with remote control. They'd make a fortune.

It falls below the bar of acceptable for me because I can't share videos or images over a certain size because it requires someone in my org to have configured SharePoint correctly which is apparently an impossible task.

I'd take teams over google chat any day.

And maybe you'd take gargling diarrhea over gargling battery acid, but the rest of us are looking on in disgust and pity either way.