Re:The Holy Grail of Linux Binary Compatibility: Musl and Dl...
by account42 on Monday January 26, 2026 @05:38AM
(#46764008)
Yeah while APE is a technically impressive trick, these issues far outweigh the minor convenience of having a single binary.
For most cases, a single Windows exe that targets the oldest version you want to support plus a single Glibc binary that dynamically links against the oldest version you want to support and so on is still the best option.
Re:The Holy Grail of Linux Binary Compatibility: Musl and Dl...
by yjftsjthsd-h on Monday January 26, 2026 @11:15AM
(#46767499)
>> Linux
> if you configure binfmt_misc
I don't think that's a requirement, it'll just fall back to the shell script bootstrap without it.
Re:The Holy Grail of Linux Binary Compatibility: Musl and Dl...
by oguz-ismail2 on Monday January 26, 2026 @11:18AM
(#46767540)
On some distros, yes. On others it'll fire up Wine for whatever reason
Re:The Holy Grail of Linux Binary Compatibility: Musl and Dl...
by yjftsjthsd-h on Monday January 26, 2026 @12:20PM
(#46768469)
Okay, yes, if you configure binfmt_misc for WINE and not APE then PE-compatible binaries will get run with WINE and not APE. That feels unfair.
Re:The Holy Grail of Linux Binary Compatibility: Musl and Dl...
by oguz-ismail2 on Monday January 26, 2026 @12:49PM
(#46768967)
>if you configure binfmt_misc for WINE
It came preconfigured on Ubuntu 20.04 and 22.04, don't know about newer versions.
if you configure binfmt_misc
>Windows
if you disable Windows Defender
>OpenBSD
only older versions