Re:A static site generator written in POSIX shell
by lombasihir on Monday January 26, 2026 @03:04AM
(#46763006)
why not perl?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:A static site generator written in POSIX shell
by oguz-ismail2 on Monday January 26, 2026 @03:11AM
(#46763053)
fell out of popularity lately
Re:A static site generator written in POSIX shell
by adityaathalye on Monday January 26, 2026 @05:29AM
(#46763944)
Sometimes we are very self-aware, but we still do things just because...
- It is a wee publishing system made of pipelined workflows, optionally driven by streams of file events (for the hotreloadin' bits).
- It will not surprise a Perl/PHP gentleperson hacker from the last century.
- It exists because one whistles silly tunes and shaves yaks.
- my site maker's README
Re:A static site generator written in POSIX shell
by accrual on Monday January 26, 2026 @10:45AM
(#46767062)
Just anecdata, but as someone who first learned HTML/JS/CSS, then PHP, shell, TypeScript, Python, other popular langs... Perl's syntax hurts my brain. :(
Re:A static site generator written in POSIX shell
by lombasihir on Tuesday January 27, 2026 @09:47AM
(#46780682)
yup, been there, even the basic perl sigil might be confusing for some people.