Re:FAA institutes nationwide drone no-fly zones around ICE o...
by ggggffggggg on Sunday January 25, 2026 @05:18PM
(#46759067)
And the emergency docket is exactly where one should look for these very recent very blatantly illegal actions and lawsuits aiming to counter them.
So yes the data is in, and yes it’s bad, and emphatically yes it’s exactly what this thread is saying. In case anyone reading in good faith was wondering.
Re:FAA institutes nationwide drone no-fly zones around ICE o...
by atonse on Sunday January 25, 2026 @05:11PM
(#46758983)
Is there a reason you’re only choosing the emergency docket in your sample size though?
Re:FAA institutes nationwide drone no-fly zones around ICE o...
by acdha on Sunday January 25, 2026 @08:43PM
(#46760779)
The emergency docket is a preferred method for blatant partisanship because it lets them immediately prevent lower courts from stopping the administration but doesn’t require them to set a binding precedent or even explain the ruling. If it looks like they might be losing power, suddenly those “emergency” decisions which were subsequently back-burnered can be dropped to prevent a Democrat from using the same powers.
At the appellate level, Trump appointed judges vote in favor of his policies at a substantially higher rate than any previous president at 92% of cases.
https://www.scotusblog.com/2026/01/looking-back-at-2025-the-...
https://www.nytimes.com/2026/01/11/us/politics/trumps-appeal...