News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Kiel Institute Analysis: US Americans pay 96% of tariff b... by dang on Wednesday January 21, 2026 @12:09PM (#46708448)
Re your first statement: certainly I've addressed that issue many times, but I can do it again: I don't believe that claim is true. It merely feels true to people with strong political passions, because everyone always over-weights the contributions of their enemies and under-weights the contributions of their own side. The significant thing—I was going to say "the ironic thing", but it isn't ironic—is that this class of politically passionate users all have the same perception even though they may have entirely opposing beliefs. In this they resemble each other more than they do anyone else.

I don't understand your second statement.

[dead]
Re:Kiel Institute Analysis: US Americans pay 96% of tariff b... by dang on Friday January 23, 2026 @01:53PM (#46736250)
We definitely banned you, for the reasons I gave at https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46699941. Banned accounts can still post to HN but their posts are killed by default.

You seem to be asking about https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46694184 and https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46691754. Those comments were killed by user flags. That was before we banned you.

Re:Kiel Institute Analysis: US Americans pay 96% of tariff b... by immibis on Friday January 23, 2026 @05:28PM (#46738851)
The buck always stops with the platform owners. You don't get to blame users for moderation decisions.
Re:Kiel Institute Analysis: US Americans pay 96% of tariff b... by dang on Friday January 23, 2026 @05:44PM (#46739010)
By that argument, it's we who are doing all the upvotes, downvotes, and flags on the site. I don't think most HN readers would look at it that way.

The distinction between moderation done by users (votes, flags, etc.) and moderation done by admins (killing posts, banning accounts, etc.) is long established and well understood by the community. It's not about blaming.