News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:EU–INC – One Europe. One Standard. – Pan-European Legal E... by 8964689797595 on Wednesday January 21, 2026 @10:21AM (#46706908)
> This is wrong on so many levels.

And yet you didn't even manage to list one. On par for claqueurs of the totalitarian EU regime.

Re:EU–INC – One Europe. One Standard. – Pan-European Legal E... by harperlee on Wednesday January 21, 2026 @10:31AM (#46707073)
For example, decades of pegging the value of the currency down, thus facilitating exports on a massive scale and thus pushing up the performance of whole industries, without other member states that would have had their currency devaluated being able to compete on prize.
Re:EU–INC – One Europe. One Standard. – Pan-European Legal E... by pegasus on Wednesday January 21, 2026 @10:35AM (#46707135)
They probably didn't list any because estimating the upsides versus the downsides is what it's about, and that's very hard to quantify. Suggesting, like you seem to, that there are no upsides to the German economy whatsoever, is just not a serious argument so doesn't actually deserve a serious answer.
Re:EU–INC – One Europe. One Standard. – Pan-European Legal E... by LunaSea on Wednesday January 21, 2026 @10:39AM (#46707200)
Tariffs on Chinese EV cars that would obliterate the German automotive industry and economy?