> system that probably has led to scientific advances in other fields
Did it though?
Wikipedia has a table for how many papers each project produced:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Berkeley_Open_Infrastructure_f...
According to this, Rosetta@home (which is like Folding@home that runs on BOINC) produced 234 papers.
Except as a kid back then, the screensaver was trivial to install and neat to look at, and BOINC was a pain. I dropped it when they switched. I imagine some less-technical adults who were interested did as well.
So I wouldn’t say it was all for nothing, but it’s main benefit was the idea, and not the results it generated