Re:Whistleblower drops 'largest ever' ICE leak to unmask agents
by 0xy on Saturday January 17, 2026 @02:42PM
(#46661337)
The ICE protester was obstructing federal law enforcement (felony) and fleeing an officer (felony). It's identical, except that case had an even murkier situation. This case is clear. She's on camera ignoring lawful commands and gunning it to flee.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Whistleblower drops 'largest ever' ICE leak to unmask agents
by treetalker on Saturday January 17, 2026 @03:06PM
(#46661534)
Last I checked, no one is a felon until so adjudicated by a court of competent jurisdiction.
Parent comment appears to have in mind either reasonable suspicion or probable cause to believe a felony was committed. So not identical at all — nor clear.
Also questionable whether any commands were lawful.
Re:Whistleblower drops 'largest ever' ICE leak to unmask agents
by backscratches on Saturday January 17, 2026 @02:53PM
(#46661426)
Show us where it is written that any felony deserves instant death without a jury. You are not making a point.
Re:Whistleblower drops 'largest ever' ICE leak to unmask agents
by goatlover on Saturday January 17, 2026 @03:45PM
(#46661904)
No it's not. See the most recent NY Times article where they analyze the shooting from every available angle, and it's clear Agent Ross was not in danger, and was not hit by Good's vehicle. His phone he was recording with hit the front of the car as he was preparing to fire his weapon.
Re:Whistleblower drops 'largest ever' ICE leak to unmask agents
by 0xy on Sunday January 18, 2026 @02:28PM
(#46671263)
They explicitly did not consider the first-person video if you review that article.
https://www.cbsnews.com/minnesota/news/experts-analyze-new-v...
CBS found the opposite, that she hit him.