News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The Influentists: AI hype without proof by torginus on Thursday January 15, 2026 @05:39AM (#46630695)
Imo getting 70% of the way is very valuable for quickly creating throwaway prototypes, exploring approaches and learning new stuff.

However getting the AI to build production quality code is sometimes quite frustrating, and requires a very hands-on approach.

Re:The Influentists: AI hype without proof by jimbo808 on Thursday January 15, 2026 @07:38AM (#46631576)
Yep - no doubt that LLMs are useful. I use them every day, for lots of stuff. It's a lot better than Google search was in its prime. Will it translate to massively increased output for the typical engineer esp. senior/staff+)? I don't think it will without a radical change to the architecture. But that is an opinion.
Re:The Influentists: AI hype without proof by rasmus-kirk on Thursday January 15, 2026 @08:43AM (#46632431)
I completely agree, I found it very funny that I have been transitioning from an "LLM sceptic" to a "LLM advocate", without changing my viewpoint. I have long said that LLM's won't be replacing swathes of the workforce any time soon and that LLM's are of course useful for specific tasks, especially prototyping and drafting.

I have gone from being challenged on the first point, to the second. The hype is not what it has been.