Re:Ford F-150 Lightning outsold the Cybertruck and was then ...
by wffurr on Wednesday January 14, 2026 @02:43PM
(#46621738)
Gas doesn't cost enough.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Ford F-150 Lightning outsold the Cybertruck and was then ...
by groundzeros2015 on Wednesday January 14, 2026 @04:24PM
(#46623720)
I think the problem is Trucks are a visible lifestyle preferences that does not align with yours.
Re:Ford F-150 Lightning outsold the Cybertruck and was then ...
by wffurr on Wednesday January 14, 2026 @05:30PM
(#46624741)
You can have all the weird lifestyle preferences you want that don't involve conspicuous waste of natural resources and accelerating anthropogenic climate change.
Re:Ford F-150 Lightning outsold the Cybertruck and was then ...
by derektank on Wednesday January 14, 2026 @06:42PM
(#46625691)
Are we not talking about electric vehicles here?
Re:Ford F-150 Lightning outsold the Cybertruck and was then ...
by chroma205 on Wednesday January 14, 2026 @06:13PM
(#46625358)
> You can have all the weird lifestyle preferences you want that don't involve conspicuous waste of natural resources and accelerating anthropogenic climate change.
you’re right.
but I’m still not changing my habits. fuck the environment
Re:Ford F-150 Lightning outsold the Cybertruck and was then ...
by chung8123 on Wednesday January 14, 2026 @08:57PM
(#46626960)
I find most people with critical looks at trucks have not looked at their own habits the most. Some have but I bet there are a lot of meat eaters here talking about how wasteful trucks are.
Re:Ford F-150 Lightning outsold the Cybertruck and was then ...
by groundzeros2015 on Wednesday January 14, 2026 @10:12PM
(#46627572)
It’s very hard to not see how any resource using activity falls in that bucket including: boating, shopping, having kids, going on vacation, having a home, ordering exotic things, eating at restaurants, using AI, etc.
The primary limiter is on how many resources we give people.