News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Is it OK to hold credit card numbers in cookies, Santander? by michael_miller on Tuesday October 16, 2012 @01:30AM (#4658566)
I think part of the incompetence has to do with what talented engineers want to work on. Most of us here on HN would never dream of writing mundane business logic software for a bank. Why would we, when we could be working on much more interesting problems, while earning a lot more money, working in a much more stimulating environment? This leaves mediocre programmers who can't get jobs at {Google, Facebook, Microsoft, Amazon, Startup X}. Talent goes where the money is, and the money is not in writing a bank web service.
Re:Is it OK to hold credit card numbers in cookies, Santander? by reissbaker on Tuesday October 16, 2012 @02:30AM (#4658660)
the money is not in writing a bank web service

This is the real issue. Banks can certainly afford to hire qualified engineers; Santander apparently chooses not to.

Re:Is it OK to hold credit card numbers in cookies, Santander? by chii on Tuesday October 16, 2012 @03:36AM (#4658777)
> Santander apparently chooses not to.

because their customers chose not to care (at least, until shit hits the fan). A bank (or any conservative organization) will only really react, as it is too slow to become proactive (otherwise, it'd be by definition, no longer conservative! ala, google, facebook etc).

Re:Is it OK to hold credit card numbers in cookies, Santander? by PeterisP on Tuesday October 16, 2012 @07:21AM (#4659229)
Because regulators don't do their job. Private customers shouldn't be responsible for auditing their bank - instead, regulators should enforce fines for banking privacy and security breaches that are an order of magnitude greater than the cost of implementing the systems securely.

The banking rules should be so that even an immoral Scrooge would see proper security as the cheaper, cost-efficient way compared to screwing their customers with shoddy systems.

If a bank teller violates financial privacy by leaking his customer's transaction lists, it carries criminal penalties in many countries. Why should a manager who intentionally violates banking privacy of thousands of customers face less prosecution?