News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Referly (YC S12) Raises $1M To Bring Affiliate Commerce T... by symlinkr on Monday October 15, 2012 @11:17AM (#4655409)
Currently they do not have a solution for this. Luckily it is easy to detect people gaming the system and I believe they handle collisions by hand at the moment. I can only assume this money will help them build a proper solution to this problem.
Re:Referly (YC S12) Raises $1M To Bring Affiliate Commerce T... by WA on Monday October 15, 2012 @11:22AM (#4655422)
If you mean by "gaming the system" that people put their own referrer tag in the link, I agree.

But I'd game the system by spamming the whole service and recommend as many products as possible.

To be honest, I don't believe that refer.ly will succeed. It adds a layer of complexity to the end user. If I recommend a product, I just write a simple email to the persom I'm recommending to. If I recommend a product on my website, I just write about it or use affiliate marketing (e. g. my own Amazon tag). What would I need refer.ly for?

A couple years ago, I've seen a startup called loved.by (google it) which was the exact same thing. It seems that the pivoted now to a more generic affiliate marketing platform.

Re:Referly (YC S12) Raises $1M To Bring Affiliate Commerce T... by truebecomefalse on Monday October 15, 2012 @11:37AM (#4655502)
Thanks for mentioning loved.by. I had never heard of them. AFAIK the Referly team started working on the idea about two years ago about when loved.by first debuted.

I think Refer.ly could work if they add enough value to the end user by aggregating every imaginable affiliate service into one and offering some sort of easy to understand and consistent metrics across all of them.

Re:Referly (YC S12) Raises $1M To Bring Affiliate Commerce T... by bduerst on Monday October 15, 2012 @01:51PM (#4656221)
An aggregator could work, but you're at the mercy of the big affiliates from which you need buy-in - and from what it sounds like Amazon isn't playing with them.

All it takes is a cease and desist letter, a la craigslist and padmapper, and you've lost a large portion of your market.

Re:Referly (YC S12) Raises $1M To Bring Affiliate Commerce T... by wtracz on Monday October 15, 2012 @04:14PM (#4656944)
The code to do this is on Github (at least for the UK): https://github.com/fubralimited/php-oara Affiliate network integration is not a technical challenge at all.
Re:Referly (YC S12) Raises $1M To Bring Affiliate Commerce T... by alexatkeplar on Monday October 15, 2012 @12:13PM (#4655702)
I'm also sceptical. It's hard enough to get consumers to understand and bother with the affiliate model when they could earn pounds (http://www.quidco.com/), let alone pennies (refer.ly). I suspect they'll pivot (either towards Shopcade or towards Skimlinks) within 12 months.
Re:Referly (YC S12) Raises $1M To Bring Affiliate Commerce T... by dmor on Monday October 15, 2012 @01:50PM (#4656209)
Referly strips out other referrer tags, and we use several approaches to handle "gaming". These are issues that every affiliate network faces, but they can be managed.
Re:Referly (YC S12) Raises $1M To Bring Affiliate Commerce T... by GrowthHacker on Monday October 15, 2012 @02:01PM (#4656265)
how are you able to track what people purchase then?
Re:Referly (YC S12) Raises $1M To Bring Affiliate Commerce T... by symlinkr on Monday October 15, 2012 @02:03PM (#4656279)
My evidence would suggest that they guess.
Re:Referly (YC S12) Raises $1M To Bring Affiliate Commerce T... by wtracz on Monday October 15, 2012 @04:07PM (#4656920)
You'd be surprised at the level of data the affiliate networks make available to the people using them. Even if you are a small affiliate, purchase/basket level data is on offer.
Re:Referly (YC S12) Raises $1M To Bring Affiliate Commerce T... by matznerd on Monday October 15, 2012 @02:31PM (#4656433)
how could they build a business off of guessing if the purchases are made. especially with the 24 hour length of the cookie, it would make it nearly impossible to track if multiple referly users have the same items. they must have some arrangement or something going on that is not clear.