I don’t think so. My favorite tool is Codex with the 5.2-codex model. I use Github Copilot and Codex at work and Codex and Cursor at home. Codex is better for harder and bigger tasks. I’ll use Copilot or Cursor for small easy things. I think Codex is better than Claude Code as well.

Are you using the same models and thinking levels for each?

I too have found Codex better than Copilot, even for simple tasks. But I don't have the same models available since my work limits the models in copilot to the stupid ones.

I have GH Copilot from work and a personal Claude Code max subscription and have noticed a difference in quality if I feed the same input prompts/requirements/spec/rules.md to Claude Code cli and GH Copilot, both using Opus 4.5, where Claude Code CLI gives better results.

Maybe there's more going on at inference time with Claude Code cli?

It is likely because GH Copilot aggressively (over-)manages context and token spend. Probably to hit their desired margins on their plans. But it actively cripples the tool for more complex work IMO. I've had many times where context was obviously being aggressively compacted and also where it will straight truncate data it reads once it reaches some limit.

I do think it is not as bad as it was 4-6 months ago. Still not as good as CC for agentic workflows.