News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:US will ban Wall Street investors from buying single-fami... by deepsun on Wednesday January 07, 2026 @07:49PM (#46535529)
Rephrasing my original point -- landlords do add value, but not as much to offset the negatives of locking down the resources.
Re:US will ban Wall Street investors from buying single-fami... by iugtmkbdfil834 on Wednesday January 07, 2026 @11:44PM (#46537282)
I disagree, but I am interested in pulling this thread somewhat. What would be alternative? The role will likely exist in some form regardless, but I suppose there are obviously ways to make it less common just by removing of its incentives. That said, I might be tipping my hand a little.
Re:US will ban Wall Street investors from buying single-fami... by deepsun on Thursday January 08, 2026 @03:04AM (#46538532)
Land Value Tax is one way, a very old idea.

Germany practices basically rent control, so that 60%+ of population rent and consider it stable. That's another way.

Maybe there are more, I didn't think hard. The basic idea is to prevent formation of an "aristocracy" that holds some limited but necessary (not luxury) resource. Pretty much every revolution happened because of that.

Re:US will ban Wall Street investors from buying single-fami... by iugtmkbdfil834 on Thursday January 08, 2026 @12:41PM (#46543962)
But wouldn't this suggest that the solution is really just stopping ( and then keeping ) things from being too excessive?