Re:Creators of Tailwind laid off 75% of their engineering team
by teaearlgraycold on Wednesday January 07, 2026 @06:18PM
(#46534655)
Agreed. If Tailwind could give you a paid subscription to a service that plugs into your agent and will recommend component compositions, styles, etc. (basically how those web app generators companies work but targeted at experienced devs) they have a chance to survive the transition.
Re:Creators of Tailwind laid off 75% of their engineering team
by ibejoeb on Wednesday January 07, 2026 @07:01PM
(#46535110)
Presumably the MCP could also be aware of the commercial products, which ought to coax the agent to apply those patterns. That'd be more useful than actually have the library.
This isn't novel either. Expo offers an MCP with its paid subscription, for instance. It's helpful. In fact, I wish the tamagui crew would get on that...
Re:Creators of Tailwind laid off 75% of their engineering team
by TiredOfLife on Thursday January 08, 2026 @04:21PM
(#46546655)
Tailwind can be made less intuitive?
Wall that's the problem, and it's tractable problem. Seems like tailwind needs a sales strategy beyond hoping people read the docs. And that it gives rise to a perverse incentive--making a less intuitive product to drive the need for documentation--is bound to affect the product.
If LLMs are really the problem, and it seems possible that they are, then you might need to lean in. Maybe selling access to mcps and skills. I'd still bet on hiring someone to chase down some contracts is going to be the easiest way out of the hole though.