Re:US will ban Wall Street investors from buying single-fami...
by mikepurvis on Wednesday January 07, 2026 @05:04PM
(#46533722)
I'm not sure if this is what you mean by secret society, but I could well imagine that these kind of limits would be hard to enforce. Like a person creates shell corporations to own their properties on their behalf, or buys them in the name of their kids, or employs randos to "own" pieces of their portfolio.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:US will ban Wall Street investors from buying single-fami...
by tadfisher on Wednesday January 07, 2026 @06:37PM
(#46534838)
They already do these things to take advantage of "primary residence" or "first-time home buyer" incentives; see the big hullabaloo over Letitia James doing it by accident.
Re:US will ban Wall Street investors from buying single-fami...
by sokoloff on Thursday January 08, 2026 @05:01AM
(#46539292)
I feel like a lot of politicians get exposed making these “accidents” that just fortunately happen to be beneficial to them.
Perhaps they ought to be more careful when filling out paperwork. Or perhaps they’re not accidents.
Re:US will ban Wall Street investors from buying single-fami...
by jazzyjackson on Thursday January 08, 2026 @12:42AM
(#46537627)
Check out the origin of freemasons, a originally a secret society of stone masons whose labor was in such high demand after the black plague rolled through Europe and England that London set a maximum wage. I forget exactly what the meetings were for but it was something like a union / underground political resistance / price-fixing agreement club that worked in all the Pythagorean and Egyptian ritual later on .