News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Opus 4.5 is not the normal AI agent experience that I hav... by zmmmmm on Tuesday January 06, 2026 @04:44PM (#46519305)
> My issues all stem from that it works, but does the wrong thing

It's an opportunity, not a problem. Because it means there's a gap in your specifications and then your tests.

I use Aider not Claude but I run it with Anthropic models. And what I found is that comprehensively writing up the documentation for a feature spec style before starting eliminates a huge amount of what you're referring to. It serves a triple purpose (a) you get the documentation, (b) you guide the AI and (c) it's surprising how often this helps to refine the feature itself. Sometimes I invoke the AI to help me write the spec as well, asking it to prompt for areas where clarification is needed etc.

Re:Opus 4.5 is not the normal AI agent experience that I hav... by giancarlostoro on Tuesday January 06, 2026 @04:57PM (#46519434)
This is how Beads works, especially with Claude Code. What I do is I tell Claude to always create a Bead when I tell it to add something, or about something that needs to be added, then I start brainstorming, and even ask it to do market research what are top apps doing for x, y or z. Then ask it to update the bead (I call them tasks) and then finally when its got enough detail, I tell it, do all of these in parallel.
Re:Opus 4.5 is not the normal AI agent experience that I hav... by beoberha on Tuesday January 06, 2026 @05:39PM (#46519847)
Beads is amazing. It’s such a simple concept but elevates agentic coding to another levels