News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Dude, where's my supersonic jet? by Animats on Tuesday January 06, 2026 @04:29PM (#46519083)
A service where your limo drives out to the aircraft, with all searches and paperwork pre-done, would have about the same time gain as going Mach 1.7 vs. Mach 0.85.
Re:Dude, where's my supersonic jet? by pinko on Tuesday January 06, 2026 @05:07PM (#46519528)
Underrated observation. The low-hanging fruit is all in the office/home-to-takeoff and touchdown-to-office/home blocks on each end, not the time in the air. The commute, checkin, security, airport transit, boarding, and taxiing are the time-sinks worth optimizing.
Re:Dude, where's my supersonic jet? by Animats on Tuesday January 06, 2026 @05:48PM (#46519942)
That's a real service. Some airports, including LAX and London Heathrow, allow a "tarmac transfer", where the limo goes directly to the plane. [1][2] Cost is $200 to $1000. That could save an hour or more at each end.

VIP Terminal Access: Skip the standard queues and enter exclusive VIP terminals where you’ll receive expedited passport control, security checks, and personalized services, all while enjoying luxury amenities. Avoid long security lines with expedited security processing, ensuring you spend minimal time in the airport.

[1] https://limossist.com/tarmac-transfers/

[2] https://airssist.com/airport-tarmac-transfer-service/

Re:Dude, where's my supersonic jet? by ekelsen on Tuesday January 06, 2026 @05:20PM (#46519661)
private jets already solve these problems.
Re:Dude, where's my supersonic jet? by mrguyorama on Wednesday January 07, 2026 @12:47PM (#46529672)
Which already is a bad signal for the article's argument. We already have a way to significantly reduce that travel time and it's a niche.

Could Boom Supersonic or whoever actually survive selling only to a hundred Taylor Swifts? How are they going to keep the lights on for the 30 years those jets fully saturate the market?

Re:Dude, where's my supersonic jet? by notahacker on Tuesday January 06, 2026 @04:58PM (#46519441)
And probably fewer regulatory hurdles (and I don't mean that because they wouldn't be considerable...)