Re:X blames users for Grok-generated CSAM; no fixes announced
by mothballed on Monday January 05, 2026 @07:23PM
(#46507157)
A man's sexual value is rarely impacted much by a nude image of themselves being available.
A woman being damaged by nudes is basically a white knight, misogynist viewpoint that proclaims a woman's value is in her chastity / modesty so by posting a manufactured nude of her you have thereby degraded her value and owe her damages.
Re:X blames users for Grok-generated CSAM; no fixes announced
by jutter on Monday January 05, 2026 @09:25PM
(#46507999)
Yes, that's the conclusion I came to as well. The best analogue I can think of is taxation, where men - whose sexual values are impacted far more by control of resources - are typically far more aggrieved by the practice than women (who typically see it as a wonderful practice that ought to be expanded).
It feels odd for them to be advertising this belief though. These are surely a lot of the same people trying to devalue virginity, glorifying public sex positivity, condemning "slut shaming", etc.
It's a fictional creation. Nobody is "taking her clothes off", a bot is fabricating a naked woman and tacking her likeness (ie. face) on to it. If anything, I could see how this could benefit women as they can now start to reasonably claim that any actual leaked nudes are instead worthless AI slop.
I don't think I would care if someone did this to me. Put "me" in the most depraved crap you can think of, I don't care. It's not me. I suspect most men feel similarly.
What's the big deal?