News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Solving the Multicore Dilemma by DasIch on Saturday October 13, 2012 @08:02PM (#4650151)
While I agree with him in theory, I doubt this will work in practice.

I very much doubt that a compiler will be able to choose appropriate parallelization schemes at runtime without hints from the user, Big-O approximation will probably be insufficient in an annoying number of cases and very hard for the compiler to implement. IO will require monads or that DAG turns into a linked list. I also find it very telling that he doesn't show what that DAG looks like for loops or recursive functions.

Re:Solving the Multicore Dilemma by sounds on Saturday October 13, 2012 @08:59PM (#4650265)
The flowlang mailing list has discussed these points in some detail; he definitely has loops.

https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups#!forum/flowlang

Re:Solving the Multicore Dilemma by lukehutch on Saturday October 13, 2012 @11:00PM (#4650448)
Right, a loop is a morphism (or sub-lattice) from the state of loop variables at the beginning of a loop iteration to the state of loop variables in the next iteration. Iteration represents unrolling copies of the loop body sub-lattice in a linear string until termination. Recursion represents expanding sub-lattices inside sub-lattices until termination.