Re:Venezuela's capital hit by explosions, smoke seen
by yes_really on Saturday January 03, 2026 @03:00PM
(#46480908)
The North was obviously threatening to engage in war against the South over the slavery/secession issues. Whoever fired the first shot is immaterial.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Venezuela's capital hit by explosions, smoke seen
by ModernMech on Saturday January 03, 2026 @03:23PM
(#46481140)
Yes it does matter because by succeeding they broke the US Constitution, and by attacking the US military they committed an act of war against the United States military. Your comparison to the current situation in Venezuela doesn't hold because the US Civil War wasn't a foreign intervention, it was a domestic constitutional conflict.
Re:Venezuela's capital hit by explosions, smoke seen
by stale2002 on Saturday January 03, 2026 @04:17PM
(#46481663)
Ok! Imagine the North was the one to fire the first shot to end slavery. In a hypothetical different timeline. Apparently you would oppose this and would just support letting slavery exist indefinitely in the south?
Re:Venezuela's capital hit by explosions, smoke seen
by 8note on Saturday January 03, 2026 @04:59PM
(#46482115)
the south was already signed onto the law for ending slavery, and were part of the same union.
you havent made a good enough hypothetical yet.
there's no lack of slave states around, including ones that the US does business with happily. i think yes, if you made your hypothetical "what if the US had a slaver neighbor" yes, the US would be leaving them alone, other than some economic pressures here and there
Re:Venezuela's capital hit by explosions, smoke seen
by terminalshort on Saturday January 03, 2026 @03:36PM
(#46481243)
There is not one word in the US constitution that bans secession.