News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Say No to Palantir in the NHS by ggm on Sunday December 28, 2025 @12:39AM (#46408753)
Healthcare use of foundry != biotech/bioinformatics use of foundry?

A former work colleague works in health ontologies. They are complicated and include EMT and ward staff using terms of art with inverse meaning.

Perhaps I misread your intent, belittling complexity in somebody else's information space (eg a function of multiple parallel legacy systems and organisational change) seems unhelpful. You weren't excited, maybe people on the management and health economics side were?

Re:Say No to Palantir in the NHS by biophysboy on Sunday December 28, 2025 @10:06AM (#46411571)
I think you misread it a bit. On the bioinformatics point, I was addressing some text in the link. I don’t mean to belittle people that work in healthcare, just suspicious how Palantir secured contracts.
Re:Say No to Palantir in the NHS by adolph on Sunday December 28, 2025 @10:43AM (#46411855)
Yeah, ontology is a key word. Its like the best concepts from things like Informatica and Pachyderm and Snowflake, structured in a semi-sane data security model and certified with all the fedramp whatnot you need to make cloud saas work for enterprise.