The Lance Armstrong Doping Report

Posted by mhb on Wednesday October 10, 2012 @08:50PM
from the thelede.blogs.nytimes.com dept.

http://thelede.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/10/10/the-armstrong-doping-report/

( 6 comments | 9 points | on HN )

Re:The Lance Armstrong Doping Report by pedalpete on Wednesday October 10, 2012 @10:12PM (#4639053)

The interesting bit is they are crowd-sourcing the 200 page document for their readers to pick out the interesting bits and report on them. Is this a new model for reporting?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:The Lance Armstrong Doping Report by mhb on Thursday October 11, 2012 @08:52AM (#4640550)

That's why my original title included the phrase "with Crowd-sourced Annotations". Alas.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:The Lance Armstrong Doping Report by dccoolgai on Wednesday October 10, 2012 @09:50PM (#4639015)

What a great story for a sports news service.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:The Lance Armstrong Doping Report by somecallmechief on Wednesday October 10, 2012 @09:56PM (#4639031)

Yep.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:The Lance Armstrong Doping Report by wkdown on Friday October 12, 2012 @12:41PM (#4645790)

What does this have to do with Hacker News?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:The Lance Armstrong Doping Report by mhb on Saturday October 13, 2012 @02:45PM (#4649299)

I was impressed by the crowd-sourced annotation.

[ Parent | on HN ]