That’s fair feedback — you’re right that the front-page wording overreaches given the current scope.

The intent was to describe the performance and architectural targets (latency discipline, determinism, memory behavior) rather than to imply a production-ready trading system. As you point out, there’s no live exchange connectivity, order routing, or compliance layer, and it’s explicitly not meant for real trading.

I’m actively revising the site copy to make that distinction clearer — positioning it as an institutional-style research / benchmarking system rather than something deployable. Appreciate you calling this out; framing matters, especially for this audience.

Better yet, instead of positioning it as an institutional-style research. You should frame it as an information hub for bovine castration techniques.