News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on FPGAs Need a New Future. Parent comment

Re:FPGAs Need a New Future by tverbeure on Monday December 22, 2025 @08:14PM (#46361293)
Or you could do the right thing, ignore the GUI for 99% of what you’re doing, and treat the FPGA tools as command line tools that are invoked by running “make”…
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:FPGAs Need a New Future by pclmulqdq on Monday December 22, 2025 @09:34PM (#46361771)
This is how most FPGA users interact with vivado/quartus these days.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:FPGAs Need a New Future by tverbeure on Monday December 22, 2025 @10:44PM (#46362216)
One really wonders when reading some of the comments here…
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:FPGAs Need a New Future by pclmulqdq on Monday December 22, 2025 @11:03PM (#46362319)
I should have said "most _professional_ FPGA users" because I assume many people here who don't know this (including the author of the article) are not.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:FPGAs Need a New Future by halfdanwhitshrt on Tuesday December 23, 2025 @08:40AM (#46365244)
Any good guides you'd recommend to get started? Also does this workflow work with the cheap Chinese FPGAs available on aliexpress (tang nano, etc)? I always wanted to try out FPGAs again and I prefer to work from command line when possible.
[ Parent | on HN ]