US destroying its reputation as a scientific leader – European science diplomat

Re:US destroying its reputation as a scientific leader – Eur... by heironimus on Monday December 22, 2025 @03:18PM (#46358509)

Is there any metric saying what the proper amount is or is it always “more”? Is there a point where others should do more and the US less?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:US destroying its reputation as a scientific leader – Eur... by estearum on Monday December 22, 2025 @03:33PM (#46358705)

It's totally valid to say we don't have the money to pay for this stuff, but to frame this as "others not doing enough" is hilariously juvenile. We do this because it's good for our economy, our people, and our global industrial dominance. Not charity, lol.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:US destroying its reputation as a scientific leader – Eur... by afavour on Monday December 22, 2025 @04:10PM (#46359129)

> With an annual budget of more than $47 billion, NIH is the largest single public funder of biomedical and behavioral research in the world. In fiscal year 2023, NIH funding generated an estimated $92.89 billion in economic activity.

https://www.nih.gov/about-nih/impact-nih-research/serving-so...

The US isn’t doing the world a favor by funding this stuff. The country directly benefits from it.

[ Parent | on HN ]