Re:A middle-class family's only option: A $43,000 health ins...
by qcnguy on Monday December 22, 2025 @12:55PM
(#46356615)
No, health insurers are motivated to keep their premium payers healthy and have a long track record of funding programmes to improve the health of the population. Think about how insurance works. Where I live they paid for the creation of outdoor gyms.
> Individual doctors and nurses etc may very well want people to get good treatment, especially children
It's individual doctors and nurses who are most incentivized to over-treat. They make more money the more healthcare is consumed. It's insurers who have an incentive to keep healthcare costs under control. A big part of the reason US health insurance is so expensive compared to the rest of the world is that Americans stage a massive freakout every time insurers try to control costs. It's a cultural thing and done by both Democrats and Republicans, look at how they call the UK's NICE committee a "death panel".
Re:A middle-class family's only option: A $43,000 health ins...
by BenFranklin100 on Monday December 22, 2025 @03:29PM
(#46358659)
Informative post, thank you.
Re:A middle-class family's only option: A $43,000 health ins...
by HDThoreaun on Monday December 22, 2025 @03:09PM
(#46358402)
Insurers are the only ones trying to control costs in healthcare.
Individual doctors and nurses etc may very well want people to get good treatment, especially children. But they are just the hired labor, the owners of the medical services and insurance industries just want the money and so likely lobby for the worse outcomes. It also has the bonus of further tying people to their employers who offer health plans making them more pliant workers.