Re:Response Healing: Reduce JSON Defects by 80%+
by lab on Friday December 19, 2025 @04:59PM
(#46331446)
A lot of it was finger written -- curious which part sounded like LLM to you?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Response Healing: Reduce JSON Defects by 80%+
by CallMeJim on Friday December 19, 2025 @06:18PM
(#46332112)
> > Here's something most developers overlook: if an LLM has a 2% JSON defect rate, and Response Healing drops that to 1%, you haven't just made a 1% improvement. You've cut your defects, bugs, and support tickets in half.
This sounds AI written.
Re:Response Healing: Reduce JSON Defects by 80%+
by nubg on Friday December 19, 2025 @05:58PM
(#46331948)
Meaning parts were LLM written? With no disclosure?
Re:Response Healing: Reduce JSON Defects by 80%+
by Sabinus on Friday December 19, 2025 @06:31PM
(#46332211)
"With no disclosure?"
Why do you have an expectation that a company will disclose to you when they use AI for their copywriting? Do you want them to disclose the software they used to draft and publish? If a manager reviewed the blog post before it went live?
Re:Response Healing: Reduce JSON Defects by 80%+
by curtisf on Friday December 19, 2025 @07:48PM
(#46332727)
Using words written by other people without disclosure has always been frowned upon. It's called plagiarism.
Plagiarism is bad for a lot of reasons, all of which also apply to the undisclosed use of generative AI.